Spectral Evidence : Criminal
Law Conference
I will show you a short video, then talk about three forensic
issues, text analysis, spectral evidence and that which is not memory.
I do not condone any contact with the private parts of children
beyond what is needed to wash them. Like everyone in this room, I do not
want my kids touched.
I am concerned about zealotry, sadism, hysteria, separation
of the powers, justice, the presumption of innocence, and the language that
defines all juvenile sexual activity as abuse.
I am concerned about laws that make victims of girls who like
petting, and criminals of their slightly older partners. There is a world
of difference between sexual assault and consensual but illegal relationships
between young persons and grown ups, between exploitative fondling and sadistic
rape, I need these linguistic distinctions to practice psychiatry.
I investigate cases for criminal litigation, Victims’ and common
law compensation and child custody in family law. I have treated paedophiles
in prisons as well as people who tell me that they were abused in childhood.
I have dealt with allegations of sexual abuse in a school playground
between four year olds at play.
Videos attached to this submission. This refers to the shorter
video.
The first part of my video shows a
nurse lecturing authoritatively, from her personal experience, to a group
of psychologists and counsellors about satanic cults in Australia. We are
told that they live in our community, could be our church-going neighbours
in Yass who, ritually satanically abuse their children from a very early age
while drugging them to prevent them from remembering.
Ruth Christie’s activities have been
part of an campaign of education promoted under the auspices of NSW and other
state departments who have funded many conferences on ritual satanic and other
sexual abuses. Ruth is responsible for the training of hundreds of therapists
including the one in the second part of the video.
Ms Christie boasts that police call
her to give expert evidence to identify abused children.
Video
The second part of the video shows women who have alleged that
their parents and others abused them sexually. They believe that they are
receiving and giving ‘treatment’ for having been sexually abused.
I would say that they are being hypnotised, exorcised and suggestions
of abuse are being implanted.
Collectively, these women have utilised thousands of police
hours and millions of dollars in health care and legal costs. They have gone
up in police helicopters to identify where ritual satanic abuse had occurred.
There will still be the devil to pay when they sue their therapists as they
do in the United States.
One of these women you have just seen was successful in convicting
her father: he died in prison. I am not allowed to identify her because of
a Supreme Court suppression order which denies her surviving family justice.
I can report that I rejected her claim for victims compensation
some six years before this video was filmed. It was too late to reverse her
father’s conviction. Hers was very obviously a fabricated memory case. I
now know that Ruth Christie had treated her.
Twenty hours of these tapes were given to me by a women who
has since repudiated her beliefs and reconciled with her family.
Sexual abuse counselling remains widespread, mainstream and
this institution still advertises its counselling activities on its web sites.
As these videos are records
of sexual abuse counselling, they would not be available to the defence of
the many persons these women have accused. Because of Mr Shaw’s legislation
protecting sex abuse therapy from disclosure, Australia remains in the grip
of a recovered memory epidemic. In the United States, the therapists are
paying out millions of dollars in thousands of negligence suits and have been
doing so for three years now.
Text analysis
Much of forensic linguistics
is common sense. We need to know exactly how a complaint came into existence
to know if it a fantasy or a report. Its reliability can be deduced from
studying its origins and its form and from finding out if the speaker labours
under a psychiatric disability. Farrell v The Queen confirmed that an expert
can be called on a complainant’s reliability.
An accuser who tells you
about conversations that took place when she was not there is telling a story.
She is not reporting an event. This is an area where expert advice on her
diagnosis and reliability can be useful.
Spectral evidence
The term ‘spectral evidence’
originated in Salem after 1692. Twelve year old Abigail Williams and her
cousins implicated 61 year old John Proctor and thirty other people in witchcraft
which included coming by night in the form of a succubus to copulate, poison
and beguile.
As more and more people
were accused, less and less was actually observed. No one had seen the witch
in their vicinity.
Clerics, judges and laymen
were intimidated, scared of appearing soft on witchcraft. In that political
climate, the disparity between allegation and evidence was not attributed
to lying, nor even to hysteria on the part of the accusers.
The courts constructed a
notion that it was not the person of the witch, but the spectre of the witch,
not her body but her ghost, her spectre, that had performed the reported acts.
This was termed ‘spectral
evidence’. It refers events which should have been manifest but remained
inconspicuous.
Fondling leaves no traces.
No one knows what happened between two people so long ago especially if one
of them denies it. However you can be certain that some episodes did not
take place as reported when such happenings would have been obvious to people
around at the time, but no one saw anything. Sexual activity of any intensity
leaves its traces, hairs, smells, stains, emotions. People get caught at
it.
I will report on some cases
from my own experience. At the age of thirty, while learning about child sexual
abuse, a woman developed the notion that her father had abused her throughout
her childhood. A marital breakdown had led to her getting therapy in a sister
institution of the one in the videotape, staffed by a social worker. Her father
was bewildered as were her estranged mother, sisters and brothers. Family
photographs showed two parents, four happy kids with cousins and friends.
She reported having had an abortion, but the hospital had no records of it.
When she was fourteen, her mother ran away with another man but the daughter
had elected to stay with her father. She supported his custody application
for the other children in an affectionate affidavit. She had no recall of
having done that.
The judge did not see anything
wrong with her story and would not allow me to examine the therapy notes whose
front page indicated that she had already told the social worker that her
father had been convicted.
A report had been created
for Victims compensation, and in it, she had alleged that her father had enjoyed
sexual intercourse with her three times a week in the family home or the shed
from when she was nine to when she was 14. She had been awarded some forty
thousand dollars in victims’ compensation before the trial, and she had already
spent half of it. She claimed that she had not received any money, but records
showed otherwise.
The jury convicted her father
and he remains in prison.
Anyone who has lived in
a house with lots of other people will attest to the difficulties of getting
privacy for nookie. Out of six resident people, their neighbours and school
friends, someone always comes home unexpectedly. No one had ever suspected,
let alone come across this recurrent activity.
This was spectral evidence
and the defence team did not allow it to emerge. The Victims’ compensation
report was suppressed. The defence lawyers saw it as a high risk strategy
to tell the jury that she had actually accused him of some fifteen hundred
rapes. The magnitude, perhaps the enormity of her complaints stayed concealed
through two appeals.
That which is not memory
The characteristics of memory
are not common knowledge. Mistaken beliefs that it works like a video recorder
underpin the statements that some accusers provide. This is known as the ‘Hollywood
presentation’, because it is like film script providing detail of action,
costume, climate and furniture.
An acrimonious separation
between her mother and stepfather was followed by period of estrangement from
her mother. The 18 year old girl declared, in the course of an savage family
argument, that her stepfather ‘did it’ to her.
A policeman friend was a
was called in and, nine months after that, she gave a 64 paragraph statement,
describing eight sexual events spanning a period of some ten years from the
ages of four to fourteen.
She was able to recall the
address of each house, the season of the year, the furniture, her clothes
and his, the time of day and exactly what he did to her on each occasion.
As well, she alleged that
sexual congress often occurred at night, when her stepfather left her unsuspecting
mother’s bed to return before dawn, unnoticed.
I dare say that no one of
us recalls exactly what we were wearing any eight days of our lives nor what
any one else wore on a specific day, even three months ago.
Most of us could not describe
our second-most recent sexual congress in the detail in which she described
his sequential hand movements.
This is not memory.
The American Psychiatric
Association calls it ‘confabulation’ and recognises it a side effect of bad
therapy or overenthusiastic victims’ services. It can be a manifestation
of any number of other mental phenomena but it is not memory.
This case also involved
spectral evidence, in that her step father, her mother and the family’s lodger
were all self-employed as couriers and they, her brother, his and her school
friends wandered in and out all hours. No one had ever come across or suspected
a sexual relationship between the stepfather and the girl.
The defence lawyer exposed
the spectral evidence and his man was acquitted on retrial. In his first
trial, conducted in the minimalist, ‘she said, he denied’ model, the jury
had convicted him on several counts but a juror dissenting on one charge was
threatened by the others so a mistrial was declared.
The prosecutor was directed
to allow the accuser to be examined by another forensic psychiatrist who fortunately
shared my view. I was not allowed to be present nor was I allowed to give
evidence as my expert advice was based only on the documents.
The triad of dubious origins,
pseudo-memory and spectral evidence tend to co-exist and they correlate well
with each other.
How spectral evidence is
to be treated provides lawyers with a conflict. It is intuitive to minimise
the allegations, limit them, rather than expose the whole fantasised scenario
to ridicule. Both strategies carry legal hazard for you and your client.
On the other hand, you may attract an appeal on the basis of incompetent defence
if the strategy of exposure fails. You may lose your only chance to get an
acquittal if you do not take the risk.
I mentioned earlier that
the reliability of a report can be deduced from studying its origins. The
case against the legendary Mr Bubbles ended in 1989 when Judge Hyde ruled
that the children's evidence was inadmissible because of interference from
parents and police.
This was not the end of
it for the teachers who had been falsely accused. To this day, the Palm Beach
Peninsula remains bitterly divided on the issue of their guilt or innocence.
Compensation is running into millions.
Had the accuser of the kindergarten
owners been investigated by multi disciplinary team, we would have learnt
of the origins of the belief in a paedophile called Mr Bubbles.
I was told that a single
mother had her three year old daughter out in a restaurant at nine in the
evening. The child yawned and stretched. Her mother, influenced by her own
substantial psychopathology, interpreted her as making a sexual gesture.
Her loaded question, ‘Tell me, who did it to you? was eventually answered
by a exhausted child looking into a fish tank, saying ‘Bubbles.’
Back
to top
|